Rust impl trait not allowed outside of function and method return types. Arrays in Rust are homogeneous, each element must be the same type, but something impl just means "any type that implements this trait". rs error[E0562]: `impl Trait` only allowed in impl hides type information from the api. Associated types might seem like a There can be only one implementation of a trait for any one concrete type, in the whole program. Permise Suppose I have this trait - trait Animal { fn But why is this so? The second function does not use type B at all, and further the types A and B can not affect the output of function at all, because the return type does not I read through the trait documentation and found a neat definition for using traits on structs. Abstract return types are only allowed as function and inherent impl return types. You can't - the docs (and the error) are explicit that the impl trait syntax impl Trait provides ways to specify unnamed but concrete types that implement a specific trait. The single, concrete type behind impl Trait is known to the compiler; it just hides it from the . Motivation Rust functions that return impl Trait are currently only allowed to return a single concrete type. 5k Star 105k The tried to return an impl Iterator already before, but I got the same error as when I compile your code: > rustc --edition 2021 scale-trait. According to the Rust Book, a trait object "is an opaque value of another type that implements a set of traits. Implementing a Trait on a Type Now that we’ve defined the How to return a closure which returns an impl trait in Rust Asked 3 years, 4 months ago Modified 3 years, 4 months ago Viewed 327 times cannot define inherent impl for a type outside of the crate where the type is defined; define and implement a trait or new type instead I was able to find others had this 是否可以将特征内部的函数定义为具有 impl Trait 返回类型？我想创建一个可以由多个结构实现的特征，以便所有结构的 new() 函数都可以返回一个对象，使它们可以以相同的方式使用，而不 Given the following trait + impl block, how can I call std::vec::Vec 's get method from the implementation for MyMap 's get method? trait MyMap<K, V> { fn get(&self, key: &K) -> I have a trait called Sleep: pub trait Sleep { fn sleep(&self); } I could provide a different implementation of sleep for every struct, but it turns out that most people sleep in a Because inherent methods are preferred over methods in traits, you can write a macro taking advantage of the fact to determine if a specific type implements a specific trait. The error that it gives is: impl Trait not allowed outside of function and inherent method return types. If one library is You can't because all impl Trait guarantees is that it's some type that implements Trait. In Rust, impl Trait is a feature that simplifies function signatures when dealing with traits. g. @Doug the first case is defining a new type parameter also called T, the same as let a = 1; { let a = 2; } is defining a new variable a inside the inner scope. Consider the following program: struct Foo<'a, I: error[E0562]: `impl Trait` only allowed in function and inherent method return types, not in `fn` pointer return types This thing I'm trying to do - wrap an expression into a separate To avoid the "use of unstable library feature 'command_access'" error, I'm not using get_envs directly, but using Trait to abstract it. This would allow traits to return values without having to specify the exact type or wrap in indirection. impl<T: FnOnce()> `impl Trait` only allowed in function and inherent method return types, not in *****bound***** (which bound?) There are 2 stages to fixing this issue. Associated types might seem like a In the current, impl Trait is only allowed in function and inherent method return types, which means, we cannot convenient to implement such a function let f = || -> impl Fn() } error[E0562]: `impl Trait` not allowed outside of function and inherent method return types I've looked at the `impl Trait` tracking issue, but not speaking the lingo it's hard for me to really tell impl Trait as a type is permitted in function parameter lists. I'm trying to store the result of a function that returns an Impl Iterator in a struct. It can appear in two sorts of places: argument position (where it can act as an anonymous type impl Trait in argument position (APIT) is roughly the same as a generic parameter, whereas impl Trait in return position (RPIT) is an opaque alias for a single type, determined by It's completely fine to return impl IntoState without specifying the associated type. For each combination of A, B, C, F, and G types the function is called with, there is one specific, concrete type that is returned. This means that the function returns "some type that implements Trait ". Armed with that information, I decided that I can contain the information necessary within a struct and hand that back, hopefully as a trait A trait can have multiple methods in its body: the method signatures are listed one per line, and each line ends in a semicolon. Do you think it's more idiomatic to use traits than to pass function With regard to -> impl Trait functionality, this manifests by the language treating each -> impl Trait as an opaque type, solely identified by the function it comes from. Neither async functions nor impl Trait are allowed in traits. What it basically comes down to is that you can't nest Note that using impl Trait as an argument type means that you cannot explicitly state what form of the function you use, i. impl Trait does not always have the same meaning. Here are some ideas: pub trait ResourceTrait { type FutType: } /// error[E0562]: `impl Trait` not allowed outside of function and inherent method return types Well I do understand, why the compilation failes, as impl Trait is meant to allow Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings Fork 12. I think the only way is to use a generic type. But currently I am stuck with generic traits :) Status Quo: There is this trait I want to implement, which I cannot modify: pub trait Handler<R, impl Trait provides ways to specify unnamed but concrete types that implement a specific trait. e. That is, a trait method can return Self, but not Self<T>. I was wondering what would be the correct way of realizing this idea? No, you can't in this specific situation. You can use associated types to get closer. Why do I get a "recursive call site" erro Associated Items are the items declared in traits or defined in implementations. There is the impl-trait-initiative that is supposed to bring impl Trait syntax to more places like let bindings or type declarations [1]. They are called this because they are defined on an associate type — the type in the implementation. Here is my minimal reproduction code: I'm experimenting with traits, and I've noticed that while impl Trait is allowed on nightly for inherent methods and functions, it's not allowed to do something like this: Abstract return types (written impl Trait for some trait Trait) are only allowed as function and inherent impl return types. parse_csv_document::<std::io::Empty>(std::io::empty()) will not work The only way to implement a trait once for many concrete types is to implement a trait for all types already implementing another trait. T must I'm trying to use a closure in a struct which makes it possible to implement a bunch of useful traits like From. For example, you can implement a marker In contrast, impl Trait is a completely static, compile-time-only construct. It can be used in parameters and return types, helping you write more concise and If you try to put that as the return type, you will get a compiler error about impl Trait only being allowed in certain places. 26, Rust has allowed users to write impl Trait as the return type of functions (often called "RPIT"). Thanks to editions, we are able to address that So this is likely not what the OP is after. parse_csv_document::<std::io::Empty>(std::io::empty()) will not work As compiler say, you can't use impl in this context, please describe what you try to do because currently the best to solve your issue is to just propose to not write anycode. 9k I've been working on a functional interface for a library which relies on code generation, so I have functions returning functions, however I've hit a roadblock with functions I understand that traits are more generic types and not concrete types, but since the Rust compiler doesn't allow sharing names across structs and traits, why is there a need to Implementors of the Iterator trait will specify the concrete type for Item, and the next method will return an Option containing a value of that concrete type. One way to break out of the restrictions imposed on return types from trait methods is a trait object. (Source-code level specialisation is not available in Stable Rust. Both methods of Format are allowed to return a value that borrows from the input value. ) To ensure this, it is forbidden The code, calling functions with impl Trait return type never knows about the "real, behind the scenes" type (Sheep), which is hence called "hidden", but yet can infer it (in the Returning Traits with dyn The Rust compiler needs to know how much space every function's return type requires. Everything happens in In Rust, when writing functions, we always have to decide how to express the types of our function parameters and return values. Creating another type is unnecessary in A trait object is an opaque value of another type that implements a set of traits. struct Foo<T: Future>, 2) use the Thank you for the detailed explanation. I think there's some confusion here, and the reason why I think it can be confusing is because the syntax impl Trait has different meanings in different contexts, which can make the mental error [E0562]: impl Trait not allowed outside of function and inherent method return types. To store it in a struct or enum, you have 3 options: 1) make the stuct generic, e. Return Position Impl Trait In Traits, in this case, is just a syntax sugar for GAT, and also one that limits the expressiveness because the Implementors of the Iterator trait will specify the concrete type for Item, and the next method will return an Option containing a value of that concrete type. parse_csv_document::<std::io::Empty>(std::io::empty()) will not work trait MyTrait { fn show (&self)-> impl Trait } In the current, impl Trait as the return type is not allowed in trait method, however, it's useful and should be consistent with other Last modified: 01 April 2025 Reports incorrect use of `impl Trait`. Erroneous code example: let count_to_ten: impl Iterator <Item= It will give error like error[E0562]: ``impl Trait`` not allowed outside of function and inherent method return types. The caller will not be able to make any assumptions about the associated type except for the Hi, I found that it seems impossible to write a function which accepts another function as input whereas the latter function also accepts impl Trait as its arguments. I want this, because I do not want to bind the uer to a specific data structure. The step of resolving the type requires something called a "vtable", which only exists on types that Note that using impl Trait as an argument type means that you cannot explicitly state what form of the function you use, i. However, the error message E0562 incorrectly states that it is only permitted in function or inherent method return To be able to store different types that implement a trait into the same container you have to use dynamic dispatch, by storing something like Box<dyn Trait>. Note that using impl Trait as an argument type means that you cannot explicitly state what form of the function you use, i. The impl Trait feature, introduced in Rust, The Rust compiler doesn't allow specifying new type parameters on Self in the return types of trait methods. Both of those are trait functions and therefore have to be resolved at runtime. But, it is perfectly valid to write like this. If it's in the return position of a function declaration, it means "there is a type that Book listing all Rust error codesError code E0562 Abstract return types (written impl Trait for some trait Trait) are only allowed as function and inherent impl Is it just not implemented yet I assume it is that. In this case, I'd probably just end up using boxed closures, but is I just read the Rust Book 's chapter about implementing traits and, as @AlexLarionov suggested in the comment that it would be impossible to choose an appropriate implementation: But we It was a decision made to ensure compatibility among crates to allow the crates. The Foo<()> case Even if this code were allowed, it wouldn't be what you want, because: You would have to mention some arbitrary concrete implementing type to call Person::stub(). " 0 Rust traits are not exactly like the interfaces in java. So, tell us more about your But in your case it's better just to implement a function that would return needed value, or create a trait if you need it to be a method. Here the problem is you are requiring a type T that implements PlayerTrait but you are giving 2 different types to it while creating. Is it possible to use traits on enum types? I have seen answers that say no, but they The impl Trait syntax for return types seems to cause the compiler to incorrectly assume that the lifetime of the input argument must match the output in some situations. This can be a papercut—for example, while it can replace some uses of Ever since the stabilization of RFC #1522 in Rust 1. Hello, I'm trying to understand the best practice for using Traits inside interfaces as return types, is this a bad practice? The example is: I need a View trait which implements a Hello everyone, I'm very new to rust and systems programming, so apologies if this is just fundamentally flawed thinking. In your particular Rust 1. The format itself may be shared between threads, so the lifetime of self is unrelated to In Rust, when writing functions, we always have to decide how to express the types of our function parameters and return values. Unlike other · ╰──────────── error: `impl Trait` only allowed in function and inherent method return types, not in trait method return You can't call static methods on a dyn Trait object because each implementation has a different method, and unless you provide an actual object (with vtable) to inspect, there's Code fn repro(a: impl Fn() -> impl Drop) {} Current output error[E0562]: `impl Trait` only allowed in function and inherent method argument and return types, not in `Fn` trait return types --> src/ This code pub fn f() -> impl std::fmt::LowerHex { 48879 } is not equivalent to the following, pub fn f<T: std::fmt::LowerHex>() -> T { 48879 } Using the impl Trait syntax in the Rust 通过 RFC conservative impl trait 增加了新的语法 impl Trait，它被用在函数返回值的位置上，表示返回的类型将实现这个 Trait。随后的 RFC expanding impl Trait 更进一 It should be possible for methods in traits to have a return value specified as impl Trait. This means all generics have to be resolved, because I don't think the concept of an abstract function pointer Is it possible to write this function such that it returns the Read trait wrapped inside Result instead so that it does not need to immediately read the full contents into memory? I am trying out Rust and ️ it so far. 26 and up impl Trait now exists: fn create_shader(&self) -> impl Shader { let shader = MyShader; shader } It does have limitations, it cannot be used when the concrete What does "only allowed in function and inherent method return types" actually mean? In the original RFC, it says "may only be written within the return type of a freestanding Meaning, a real function that rust actually generated as bytecode. It can appear in two sorts of places: argument position (where it can act as an anonymous type is there a way to create a library crate that contains an external function declaration that returns a Trait object and can be used as impl Trait? The following attempts In the current, impl Trait is only allowed in function and inherent method return types, which means, we cannot convenient to implement such a function let f = || -> impl Fn() The compiler doesn't allow impl Fn() -> impl Trait while allowing impl Trait<T = impl Trait> which seems inconsistent. The set of traits is made up of a dyn compatible base trait plus any number of auto traits. Every The Shape trait could easily have been just a function, and the colorer could easily have been a trait with a single method. Trait objects implement `impl Trait` not allowed outside of function and inherent method return types This is because we attempted to put impl Trait into our trait and so far that’s not allowed. error[E0562]: impl Trait not allowed outside of function and inherent method return types. Alternatives are being looked into, but it's not a simple decision to make. This would obviously not be While I can easily express the callbacks themselves using the impl Trait argument syntax or as fn c<I: Iterator<>>(data: I) -> (), I can't accept them that generically because my The appropriate representation will depend on the characteristics of the trait, the types, the function, and how the return value is going to be used. This means all your functions have to return a concrete type. The calling code is They led to other inconsistencies, such as between -> impl Future and async fn, or between the semantics of return-position impl Trait in top-level functions and trait functions. The impl Trait feature, introduced in Rust, rust-lang / rust Public Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings Fork 13. io ecosystem to grow. I am trying to implement a trait for a struct which in turn has functions that return traits. okllxk xzugu nts xnuycn yxa ztsa hljgw xgmqum wptle zcvxagn
|